1. The subject of comparative typology and its aims

Agentive relations: written by 2. Objective relations: to be angry/ satisfied with 3. Attributive relations: друзі з Канади. 4. Various adverbial relations: a) temporal: to depart on Monday; b) local: in the cottage; с) of direction: into the room,; d) of manner or comparison: to look in astonishment; е) of attendant circumstances: зима прийшла зі снігопадами; f) of cause: від спеки. g) of concession: despite the rain5. Various other relations as: a) Relations of resemblance: she is like her mother b) Relations of subordination: бути секретарем у посла, с) Relations of dissociation: to be devoid of suspicion

Allomorphism in the nature of the syntactic functions of prepositions. linking in English. In Ukrainian, on the other hand, prepositions govern nouns, pronouns, numerals, substantivised adjectives and nominal word-groups праця в садку/на полі
Conjunctions
are functional words realising the connection of homogeneous parts in co-ordinate word-groups and sentences or linking subordinate clauses in composite sentences. structure – isomorphism: 1) Simple (and, but, or, if, that, till і /й, а, бо, ні, та/. 2) Derivative/compound: all + though --» although, un + less -» unless, be + cause — » because, un + till -» until, where + as -» whereas, a + бо -» або, за + те -» зате, про + те — проте, як + що -» якщо, як + би -» якби, etc. 3) Composite (складені): as if, as soon as, in order that; так що; через те, що; для того, щоб; з того час, як; відтоді, як, etc.
NON-repeated (and, but, since a,) repeated (in Ukrainian) or correlative (in English), both... and, either..or, i — i, ні — ні,
common-isomorphic groups: a) co-ordinating conjunctions and b) subordinating conjunctions