Ў збекистон республикаси олий ва ўрта махсус таълим вазирлиги ўзбекистон давлат жаҳон тиллари университети инглиз тили 1-факультети

Technology of the seminar

The number of students: 10 – 15	Time: 2 hours
Form of the lesson	Practical lesson. Quizzing.
Plan (Contents) of the lesson	Lexical transformations: general considerations; Substitution as a type of lexical transformation Antonymic translation
The aim of the lesson: Developing theoretical knowledge and practical skills connected with lexical problems of translation; clarifying the types of lexical transformations; expanding knowledge and skills on the use of substitution as a type of lexical transformation; expanding knowledge and developing skills on the application of antonymic translation. .
Pedagogical objectives	The results of training activity
Expanding knowledge about the lexical transformations; Deepening and developing knowledge on substitution as a type of lexical transformation; Developing knowledge and skills needed to apply substitution as a special type of lexical transformation; Expanding knowledge about the antonymic translation; Developing skills needed to apply technique of antonymic translation to the translating process.	Clarifying and identifying the types of lexical transformations; Clarifying and outlining the basic points of substitution as a type of lexical transformation; Clarifying the distinctive features of substitution as a special type of lexical transformation and applying it to the translating process; Clarifying basic factors characterizing the mechanisms of antonymic translation; Clarifying the technique of antonymic translation and applying it to the translating process.
The ways of teaching and technique	Making presentation, round table discussion, brain-storming, quizzing, multiple choice test
Means of teaching	Text of the lecture, problem questions, textbook
Teaching forms	Individual, frontal, group working
Teaching conditions	Classroom equipped with IT
Monitoring and evaluating	Oral speech control, quiz, self-control, Rating system evaluation